Souter Crescent, Footscray VIC. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Vol. 6 No. 1; December 2015, 87-93 pp. — ISSN 2203-4714Sentential negation in modern Mongolian is not sufficiently studied in sentential and discourse levels. The tendency of modern linguistic requires us to conduct more comprehensive and deeper research than previous scholars did. Our research is considered to be the first intended research on negation in modern Mongolian, because it is one part of Ph.D dissertation on negative meaning of modern Mongolian. There are two forms of sentential negations in modern Mongolian language, namely: explicit and implicit. Explicit negation is expressed by negative markers, but implicit negation is expressed by forms without negative markers, positive forms, intonations, structures with interrogative words and phrases. Negative markers have preverbal and postverbal positions in sentences. Preverbal negative markers are all particles (büü, bitgij, ül, es, alga) and have SONegV sentential type, but postverbal negative markers are particles (ügüj, biš, bus) and negative grammatical morphemes (-güj, -údzaj2, -lgüj, -ltgüj, -mgüj, -šgüj) which have SOVNeg type. Particles, which are used as preverbal and postverbal negative markers in modern Mongolian, have more specific features than negative markers in other languages. Their unique features are to be used not only as negative markers in negative sentences, but also to substitute for verb phrases in c-command and sentences in the discourse level. This paper aims to consider how sentential negative markers in modern Mongolian are used as pro-forms of negative sentences.

尊敬的读者：
欢迎您访问我们的网站。本站的初衷是为大家提供一个共享学习资料、交换知识的平台。每位用户都可以将文件上传至网盘并分享。
然而，随着用户上传的资料增多，我们发现部分不宜或版权问题的书籍被分享到了本站。
为此，我们已经关闭了分享入口，并进行了多次书籍审查，但仍有部分内容未能彻底审查到位。
在此，我们恳请广大读者与我们共同监督，如发现任何不宜内容，请 点击此处 进行举报，我们会第一时间处理并下架相关内容。
希望我们能共建一个文明社区！感谢您的理解与支持！